[ad_1]
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump took up another branch of government in the middle of his fiery remarks at a rally on Jan. 6, 2021, when he ended by urging his supporters to go to the Capitol.
“I’m not happy with the Supreme Court,” he said. “They love to have control over me.”
Does the former president who reorganized the Supreme Court to ensure a strong conservative supermajority have a point? Will Trump, who promised when he first ran for president to usher in an era of “big wins”, be able to wind up the losers in the blockbuster landmark case being argued before the Supreme Court this week?
On Thursday, Trump’s lawyers will appear before a judge to consider whether Trump could be disqualified from returning to the White House for inciting an insurrection on January 6, 2021. The court will include three justices he appointed, as well as three others appointed by previous Republican presidents.
Trump has scored some big victories on this 6-3 conservative court, most notably removing the constitutional right to abortion, but his record has been surprisingly uneven.
Preparing to vote: See who’s running for president and compare their positions on important issues with our voter guide
President Trump: Supreme Court has worst record since Roosevelt
After Trump lost reelection in 2020, the court rejected a Texas lawsuit aimed at overturning the results in four battleground states.
The court also allowed New York City prosecutors and Congress to obtain his tax records and did not stop a congressional committee investigating Jan. 6 from accessing presidential documents. The justices also rejected Trump’s request to intervene in a dispute over classified documents seized at his Mar-a-Lago club in 2022.
And the Trump administration had the worst performance on the Supreme Court since at least the Roosevelt administration, according to data compiled by law professors Rebecca Brown and Lee Epstein for an article published in Presidential Studies Quarterly. .
Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, said, “Regardless of the politics of the Supreme Court’s members, the Supreme Court is committed to providing oversight and accountability in cases involving Donald Trump.” “And we have a track record of taking a strong stance on checking abuses of power.” “With that in mind, we expect the court to fairly hear this case and rule on the facts and law,” a watchdog group representing Colorado voters challenging Trump’s voting eligibility said in Washington. “I am doing so,” he said.
Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas, said Trump’s past losses in court are noteworthy because he might have been expected to win more in a conservative court. .
But he said it is unlikely to indicate what the court will rule on the Colorado case, which is far more important to the nation.
Rather, Mr. Vladek said, this moment is based on the court’s past rulings on desegregation and President Richard Nixon’s Watergate scandal, when the justices played neutral arbiters to try to lower the temperature. He sees it as similar to the court’s previous rulings on whether the tapes had to be turned over.
“But I don’t know what that looks like,” he said. “It’s not clear to me where there’s going to be some kind of ‘everyone gets something’ decision that would draw judges from both ends of the court. And I feel like that’s what we need right now.” What we need is for the court to speak in a way that does not further exacerbate current political tensions.”
Will Trump’s second term as president provide a new chance to shape the Supreme Court?
The Colorado dispute is not the only case in which the Supreme Court could decide President Trump’s future. The agency is investigating how federal prosecutors investigated the Jan. 6 rioters in a case that could also affect federal charges against Trump for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election. I’m considering raising an objection to Iruka. Additionally, President Trump is expected to ask the Supreme Court to rule that as a former president, he is immune from prosecution.
If Trump can overcome all legal challenges and convince voters to return him to the White House, he may be able to further solidify the conservative supermajority he has built in the courts.
That would only deepen the ties between the Supreme Court and President Trump’s political fortunes that began in 2016.
He won over Christian rights in the Republican Party by pledging to select Supreme Court justices who oppose abortion rights, a move that could “automatically” overturn Roe v. Wade in court. said.
That happened in 2022 with the support of three justices he appointed: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. The court’s conservative supermajority also set a new standard for evaluating gun control and struck down affirmative action in college admissions.
For President Trump, repealing abortion rights was a ‘miracle’
Trump’s court reform has been one of his greatest accomplishments, especially since all three candidates are under 60.
If Trump were to become president again, he would have a chance to replace two of the oldest conservative justices, Justice Clarence Thomas (75 years old) and Justice Samuel Alito (73 years old), with younger justices who could maintain a supermajority well into the future. Might happen.
“The next election is very important for the Supreme Court, but people aren’t paying attention to it yet. If Trump wins, Alito and Thomas could retire and be replaced by younger, even crazier right-wing justices. Because it’s very sexual,” Jon Favreau said. The former speechwriter for President Barack Obama said recently on his co-host’s podcast.
President Joe Biden hopes the court’s overturning of the 50-year-old constitutional right to abortion will help stop President Trump’s actions.
“He described Dobbs’ decision as a ‘miracle.’” Biden said this at his first major campaign rally of 2024 in Virginia last month. ”But for American women, it’s a nightmare..Trump and Biden “have no idea about the power of women in America,” he said.
“They go out of their way to show that they are completely impartial.”
President Trump’s complaint to the Supreme Court at the “Save America” rally on January 6, 2021, states that Texas cannot challenge the 2020 election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. It came weeks after the Supreme Court ruled that it could not.
He suggested that the reason the judges were “ruling so much against me” to appear fair was “because they’re my puppets.”
“And now the only way they can get out of it is because they hate that it’s not good socially. And the only way they can get out of it is to rule against Trump.” He said. “So let’s rule against Trump. And that’s what they do.”
Trump made similar comments last month on his Truth Social platform, complaining that “Republican judges are often afraid to do the right thing.”
“They do everything in their power to show that they are completely impartial,” he wrote, “to the point of making truly egregious and unfair decisions.”
more:“Open Mic Night” at the Supreme Court?Don’t expect Donald Trump to run wild in his marble palace
[ad_2]
Source link
