[ad_1]
The 20 most read articles of 2023, repeated in reverse order, This is number 1. The first edition was published on September 29th.
We knew from the beginning that the sequence of CoV-SARS-2 contained an insertion that could not occur naturally and was similar to that already released from the Wuhan laboratory. Had to endure incredible disrespect from scientists. He has been subjected to the stigma of ostracism and being “de-contracted” by the MSM and his professional colleagues for nearly three years.
In the summer of 2020, a paper I co-authored describing the findings of a team of British-Norwegian scientists that demonstrated a unique ‘fingerprint’ of laboratory manipulation in the novel coronavirus was suppressed in both the US and UK. . The World Health Organization, major scientific journals and others have gone to great lengths to convince us that the coronavirus is a natural phenomenon and that we should spend more money fighting such threats in the future. It was a time when I was spending a lot of money.
Only now, telegraph (Uncritically) The U.S. government is no longer funding research it has denied for nearly three years, and has left MSM on hold. But for those who follow primary sources (particularly those ignored by MSM and the BBC, flagged as misinformation by Ofcom, and targeted by the UK government’s Orwellian Disinformation Unit), mRNA vaccines are unlikely to be effective. What happened was an open secret. Don’t do what it says on the vial, so to speak.
First, the “vaccine” does not stay at the injection site as promised, but travels throughout the body, and post-mortem autopsies show it to be everywhere.
Accusations of dramatic variation in batch-to-batch variation (an absolute “no-no” in vaccine manufacturing protocols) that could explain why side effects are more common in some batches than others have been denied, but here This was supported by a definitive Danish study reported in . https://www.conservativewomen.co.uk/vaccine-dangers-is-this-the-strongest-evidence-yet/ These alarming concerns should have prompted a thorough investigation immediately. It appears to have been ignored by regulators.
All the while, regulators and politicians have parroted their own ‘highest standards’ assurances and repeatedly declared that the growing number of disturbing UK yellow cards and US VAERS adverse event reports are nothing to worry about. .
Last June, whistleblowers led by scientists Sucharit Bhakdi and Kevin McKernan raised an entirely new concern: severe levels of DNA contamination. This too was ignored by the MSM. Despite gleefully reporting strange side effects from vaccines as an excuse to point out how rare they are, they never mention the increasingly problematic official “safe and effective” mantra. Not yet.
Finally there was a small breakthrough. As a lone but braver branch of the MSM, spectator australia Serious levels of contamination of both Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA Covid vaccines have finally been revealed. In this article, Boston genomics scientist Kevin McKernan used Pfizer and Moderna vials as controls in his study and found that they contained very significant DNA plasmid contamination. It explains the background. The magazine reports that McKernan was alarmed to discover the presence of the SV40 promoter in Pfizer’s vaccine vials. The promoter is a sequence “used to drive DNA into the nucleus, particularly in gene therapy,” and is “monitored by regulatory authorities around the world.” He specifically notes that this is not possible with mRNA vaccines. These his SV40 promoters are also well known to be oncogenic or cancer-inducing.
Others confirmed these findings. A German biologist whistleblower found contamination rates up to 354 times the recommended limit. All of this has been reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). That’s very important.
Frankly, this means that they are not vaccines, they are genetically modified organisms that should be subject to completely different regulatory conditions and should not be classified as vaccines. This has been acknowledged by the TGA, Australia’s version of the FDA, and has changed the situation so much that Victorian Premier Dan Andrews, who had been the biggest champion of the vaccine and its compulsory use, resigned. The timing of his writing on vaccines was not mentioned as a reason for his resignation. (Paula Jardine reported in these pages in December 2021 about this regulatory maneuver to grant vaccine emergency use authorization to gene therapies.)
All of this data follows the latest finding, which is slowly becoming public knowledge, that the booster vaccine actually increases the chance of infection by 3.6 times. This is according to a detailed study published by the Cleveland Clinic, one of the world’s largest medical institutions, which monitored not only patients but also staff.
becomes terrible. Proponents of the technology say it can be adapted to track new variants. But you can’t do that. Results for bivalent vaccines (containing components against at least two variants) are similar. The authors of the Cleveland study stated that “no study has shown that a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine protects against severe disease or death caused by the Omicron variant XBB strain.” There is. At least one previous study failed to find a protective effect of bivalent vaccines against the His XBB strain of SARS-CoV-2.
In one study, all bivalent vaccinated mice infected with the new coronavirus became ill.
This is what many of us expected because the SARS virus is susceptible to immunological imprinting. This means that once the virus sees a vaccine, it will have the same reaction to any close variants that create further vaccines (this is also known as “antigenic sin”). They are not only useless but more dangerous because they induce infection-enhancing antibodies (ADE antibodies) rather than being cross-reactive as the manufacturers claim.
This is not the end of the problem with mRNA “vaccines.” Several immunological studies have shown that boosting not only induces a switch of antibodies from the neutralizing to the tolerant subtype, but also induces significant T cell suppression, all of which are associated with new It promotes infection and suppresses the immune response against cancer.
Late last year, I reported that a melanoma patient whose symptoms had been stable for years had a recurrence after the first booster (third injection). I was told to keep quiet because it was just a coincidence, but that became impossible. Since then, the number of my affected patients has continued to grow. Just last week, I saw two more cases of my patients whose cancer returned after booster vaccinations.
Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world, including Australia and the United States. No longer limited to melanoma, the consensus is that increased incidence of lymphoma, leukemia, and kidney cancer is seen after booster injections. Additionally, colleagues in colorectal cancer have reported an increase in the prevalence of explosive cancers (cancers with multiple metastases, such as in the liver). All of these cancers (with a few exceptions) have occurred in patients who were forced to get a COVID-19 booster shot to travel, whether they were eager or not.
So why do these cancers occur? Given that immunotherapy is so effective against these cancers, T-cell suppression was the first explanation I thought of. However, we now also need to consider the integration of SV40 with DNA plasmids in promoting cancer development, and reports that the mRNA spike protein binds to p53 and other tumor suppressor genes make this feature even more concerning. Now. These vaccines have the perfect storm for cancer development in patients lucky enough to avoid heart attacks, blood clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases, and other common side effects of coronavirus vaccines. It is very clear that there are several contributing factors involved, and it is very frightening.
Recommending additional vaccines like this one is neither more nor less than medical incompetence. Continuing to use the information above is medical negligence and may result in imprisonment.
There are no more “what ifs” or “buts”. All mRNA vaccines must be stopped and banned immediately.
[ad_2]
Source link
