[ad_1]
Washington DC – Today, Chairman Roger Williams (R-Texas) led the full Committee with the title “Small Business Committee Hearing.”Burdensome Regulation: Examining the Impact of EPA Regulation on Main Street. ” Chairman Williams issued the following statement after today’s hearing.
“Today’s hearing was especially important as the EPA continues to smother American industry with bureaucracy and stifle innovation.” said Chairman Williams. “We have heard directly from companies who are being forced to defend themselves due to the EPA’s burdensome regulations. And while the EPA sometimes takes input from small businesses, it is important to note that the final regulations are We also found that their input was consistently ignored and ignored when creating Main Street America. We will continue to implement the best possible policies.
—
Watch the full hearing here.
Below are key excerpts from today’s hearing.
Chairman Williams: “In some cases, the EPA is so aggressive that they try to regulate entire industries out of existence. My family has been in the auto industry for almost 89 years. I’ve been in this industry for 50 years. But I’ve never seen them so aggressively regulating tailpipe emissions and forcing a transition to electric cars…and they should just decide that people just want it. The oil and gas industry is now facing similar hostility from this government agency. So, Mr. Wagner, can you tell us more about how the EPA is treating the oil and gas industry in comparison to renewable energy companies? And what is the long term of this forced transition? What do you think the impact will be?” Mr. Wagner: “Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The difference between a lot of what we see in the green industry and the renewable industry that I am familiar with is that on one of our farms and ranches, on my family’s land. There’s a wind turbine on one of the ranches. So I’ve seen what happens when large scale renewable energy comes to a small town and what they do, and I support the EPA and more regulation. The big push from a lot of people is that this duplicity is going to take jobs out of my industry.As I said in my testimony, the regulations that are coming, I am already highly regulated. I’m a marginal oil producer. I know what resources are coming out of the wellhead and what I’m selling. And if there’s a loss somewhere between those two points, there’s no leakage or We can’t afford to let anything leak, so we’ll look into it before the regulators do.”
Congressman Mueser: “The question we posed was, ‘Do we have to give up the environment to develop land, develop manufacturing, and develop medical devices that save lives?'” Faris, first of all, you. Let’s start with. Please let me know what you think about that comment. How many manufacturers are you responsible for? ” Mr. Faris: “Nearly 14,000.” Congressman Mueser: “14,000 companies, how many of them are small and medium-sized enterprises?” Mr. Faris: “The majority.” Congressman Mueser: “Okay, that’s the majority. Number one, do you think they agree with that comment? Number two, do you think they agree with that comment? Number two, do you think the EPA should come and talk to you and make sure this rule is made to really take care of the community?” “What impact will this have on the majority of the 14,000 small businesses that create jobs that pay for the small leagues that invest in the environment?” Mr. Faris: “Thank you, Congressman. And what I can say is there doesn’t have to be a trade-off. Industry is working, we have the cleanest air in the world, we innovate, Those technologies have resulted in some of the cleanest air in the world. One of the big problems we currently see with these regulations is that they are too close to zero to be achievable. Yes, there doesn’t have to be a trade-off. We can have clean air, we can have a great economy, but we can’t do that with the regulations we’re seeing now. Then , is the EPA listening? Is the EPA listening? I make a distinction between listening and hearing. Yes, there are hearing sessions where concerns are heard, but they are not listening. Do you have?”
Congressman Stover: “They are imposing extreme Green New Deal policies on our businesses without regard to the overwhelming costs. And now they are targeting our health care. Proposed Regulations on ETO Sterilization, Ethylene Oxide Sterilization This technology eliminates the need for chemicals used to sterilize medical devices, and eliminating ETO would require manufacturers to change the way they sterilize medical devices, adopting more expensive or less effective solutions. Additionally, tools such as ventilators, heart valves, pacemakers, and catheters may not be able to replace ETO with other sterilization methods because other methods are ineffective or harmful. Many can only be properly sterilized with ETO. Don’t get me wrong, this rule will increase costs, reduce access, and eliminate services for the healthcare industry, and the first to be negatively affected will always be Rural America is important. Rural America, rural medicine, and rural hospitals are important. Dr. Acklog performs nearly 1 million breast biopsies, 300,000 hysterectomies, and 500,000 open-heart surgeries each year. Millions of individual medical devices are needed for the 1.1 million C-sections performed each year, and the equipment for all the procedures just mentioned is sterilized by ETO? And sterilized? What is the impact if they are no longer available because they are not being done?” Dr. Acrog: “The answer is yes. So I can give you all the examples you gave. These are kits that are packaged for use in surgery, surgical kits, that provide sterile devices. In order to be able to do that, they have to infiltrate the gas inside the package. So the answer is that it’s their only option. And without it, again, the delay in surgery would be catastrophic. may cause serious harm and may result in death or harm.”
###
[ad_2]
Source link
