[ad_1]
Haley announced her resignation Wednesday after winning Sunday’s Washington, D.C., and Super Tuesday Vermont primaries but losing more than 20 other races to Donald Trump.
“I said I want Americans to have their voices heard,” Haley said. “I did it. I have no regrets.”
Haley still refused to endorse Trump and asked voters to convince her to support him. Haley’s lack of support stood in contrast to many reluctant establishment voices, such as Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who rallied behind Trump on Wednesday. .
Now we enter what will likely be an expensive, incredibly vicious, and protracted general election battle between a president and a former president.
But before we turn the page, let’s take a look at the Republican fight, specifically Haley’s candidacy. — You told me.
Although it has been clear for some time that Ms. Haley would not win the nomination, she remained a candidate for a longer period of time than a candidate in her position would normally do. In doing so, she provided us with very important information regarding the status of the party.
Calls for Haley to step down have been on the wall for weeks as Trump racks up victory after victory. And she has all but admitted that her own campaign is less about actually winning and more about making her case.
On that point: Donald Trump is a liability to my party, and I’m going to prove it.
In the end, Haley’s campaign primarily served a somewhat different but valuable purpose: to show how today’s Republican Party is defined by Trump, and traditional conservatism has little use for it. .
Haley’s campaign has given us a fairly direct test that we have not been able to perform before. It’s about what would happen if voters were faced with a one-on-one choice between Trump and the Republican Party of yesteryear.
Haley was evoking the era of Reagan and George W. Bush. It would be hard to find a more typical standard bearer. Conservative but pragmatic, fiscally conscious, hawkish on issues such as Russia and Ukraine, and almost uniquely indifferent to right-wing provocations.
Ms. Haley refused to try to reinvent herself, even when it was clear that her approach was not working. And while she feels her grief, At least we were able to test the Republican position more precisely because the Never Trumpers and the left did not adopt their approach.
“I’m not anti-Trump. I support America and the direction America is going,” she told CNN’s Dana Bash on Friday.
Her major losses indicate the direction the Republican Party wants to go, and it is not the direction of Haley, Bush, or Reagan. Aside from wins in Vermont and Washington, D.C., and more than 40 percent in New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Utah, she received only about a quarter of the vote overall. She won 27% in last week’s Michigan primary and averaged 26% in 15 states on Super Tuesday.
Opinions of party voters were quite predictable. Haley voters overwhelmingly disliked Trump and were more moderate, educated and suburban.Trump was overwhelmingly popular. The people who cared most about a candidate who falsely denied the results of the 2020 presidential election and “fights for people like me.”
It was a choice between traditional conservatism and emotion, and emotion won in a landslide.
As is clear, Trump had an advantage among actual Republicans, winning at least 70 percent in most cases. On Super Tuesday, the number rose to about 8 out of 10 in both North Carolina and Virginia.
The message was clear. Trump’s vision certainly took over the conservative movement, but more than that, it took over the Republican Party itself.
Haley’s Voters are necessary, at least in part, for a party to win. But her idea of republicanism is no longer the real Republican Party — it’s different from the current makeup of the party.
Haley’s goal in the 2024 campaign was not to prove that her party had left her and Reagan behind. But that will be his legacy.
Hailey’s moments and lack of momentum in numbers
Some statistics that stood out from the campaign:
First place: With her wins in Washington, D.C. and Vermont, Haley became the first woman to win a Republican primary. Her closest opponent was former Sen. Margaret Chase Smith (R-Maine), who won 25% of the vote in the 1964 Illinois primary. (Few women have run significant campaigns in Republican presidential elections, including Michele Bachmann in 2012 and Carly Fiorina in 2016.)
12: Number of contests Haley outperformed Smith in Illinois.
89: Number of delegates Ms. Haley won, according to the Post’s delegate tracker. Trump has more than 10 times that number (995), leaving him with just over 200 votes to effectively clinch the nomination.
68 percent: The average percentage of Haley voters in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina said they would not support Trump in November, according to a FOX News/AP voter analysis.
32 points: Haley lost by more than 2-1 to “none of these candidates” in the iconic Nevada primary. (Mr. Trump was not on the ballot, instead running in the state caucuses.) The results confirmed that Ms. Haley was not a viable option for most of her party. Many late polls showed her as the only favorite among her primary voters.
3: Number of members of Congress who support Haley. Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) joined Rep. Ralph Norman (R.C.) on Friday. lack of support from The institutional wing of the Republican Party symbolized party members’ fear of alienating Mr. Trump and his base.
Decisive moment 6 years ago
The moment that has always stuck with me when it comes to Haley and her party relationship happened in early 2018.
Haley, who attended an event hosted by Turning Point USA, a group for young conservatives, urged high school students in attendance to avoid the “defend your freedom” mentality.
She asked whether those present had “posted anything online, with or without citations, to ‘own the library.'”
“I know it’s fun and it feels good, but take a step back and think about what you’re accomplishing when you do this. Are you convincing anyone? Who are you convincing? Are you there?” Haley implored the audience. “We’ve all been guilty of it at one time or another, but this kind of speech is not leadership. Quite the opposite.”
She added: “Real leadership is about persuasion. It’s about movement, about getting people around you to see your point of view. Rather than yelling at them, it’s about convincing them that seeing things your way is what’s best for them.” By showing that it is a benefit.”
This was a very remarkable attempt to steer the youth of her party in a different direction. And it’s notable not just because the activist group she was speaking to leans increasingly toward the fringes, but also because her boss at the time, Trump, had a pro-freedom approach. This is because it was very characterized by
Six years later, it’s clear Haley’s pleas have fallen on deaf ears. The party wants you to stand up to its standard bearers.
[ad_2]
Source link
