[ad_1]
Amid growing protests calling for national elections, a majority of Israelis want MK Benny Gantz’s National Unity Party to remain in power, according to an Israel Democracy Institute poll on Sunday. It has been found.
However, the poll found that a majority of Jewish Israelis (62%) said that national unity should remain, and 23% said that it should leave, compared to just 22% of Arab Israelis. of the respondents believe that national unity should remain, with 55% saying “national unity.” He should leave the government. The remainder of both groups said they “didn’t know.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will still have a majority in Israel’s parliament even if National Unity leaves power, but the party’s departure is widely seen as a trigger that could lead to more protests and calls for elections. It is being
As expected, therefore, a majority of voters in all coalition parties believe that national unity should be maintained, with 75% of party voters agreeing. A majority (57%) of voters in opposition party Yisrael Beitenu also said Gantz should remain in office. Although Yisrael Beitenu only recently began calling for elections, in the first months of the war party chairman MK Avigdor Liberman warned against them.
Voters from other parties want Gantz to leave the government.
But voters from other opposition parties say Gantz should leave power, with 44% of voters in the centrist Yesh Atid party saying so, compared to 44% who think Gantz should stay in office. It was 42.5%. Among Labor voters, the numbers were even more skewed toward Leave (46% said Gantz should remain, compared with 37% who said he should remain). Of those who said they would vote for Meretz, 81% said National Unity should leave, while only 12% said it should remain.
The poll is the 12th conducted by IDI’s Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research since the outbreak of war with Hamas on October 7, and is among other issues on the public agenda. I also asked about the problem. He works for the IDF. U.S. support for Israel and its position in the world. Israel’s policy on Muslim visitation rights to the Temple Mount during the month of Ramadan. more.
Regarding conscription for Haredim, a majority of Jewish respondents (70%) believe that the exemptions granted to Haredim should be changed. However, when asked about Arab civil servants in Israel, Jewish respondents were divided, with 42% saying they thought the current exemption should be changed and 41% saying it should be changed. I answered that it wasn’t. Only 28% of Israeli Arabs said the exemption should be changed, compared to 53% who said it should not be changed. Interestingly, 19% of Haredi respondents said the exemption should be changed (compared to 68.5% who said it should not be changed, as expected).
Regarding Israel’s status on the international stage, 44% of Jewish Israelis think it is “poor” or “not good at all,” compared to 33% who say “fair” and “good.” Only 22% answered. or “very good”. Among Arab Israelis, 63% said the status of Israel is poor or not at all good, compared to 17% who said it was fair and 17 who said it was good or very good. It was only %.
The poll also found that, “Given the disagreements between the Israeli and U.S. governments over a political agreement and continued fighting in Gaza, how much do people now feel comfortable relying on continued large-scale U.S. aid to Israel?” “Is it possible?” was the question. ” Only 15% of respondents answered “completely,” 24% answered “quite a bit,” 34% answered “somewhat,” and 11 answered “somewhat.” %, and 9% said “not at all.”
The questions regarding Ramadan are as follows: “The month of Ramadan is about to begin. Against the background of the current security situation, special restrictions imposed by the Israeli government on the access of Israeli Arab nationals to the Temple Mount grounds have resulted in (a) violence on the Temple Mount grounds; Do you think that acts of violence or attacks are more likely to occur during Ramadan; (b) do not affect the likelihood of acts of violence or attacks that occur during Ramadan; Does it reduce the likelihood of an attack occurring?”
Among Jewish respondents, 45% said they believed such measures would increase the likelihood of violence, 17% said they would have no effect, and 22% said they would reduce violence. Among Arab respondents, 69% said such measures would increase the likelihood of violence, 11% said they would be ineffective, and 9% said they would reduce the likelihood of violence.
The survey was conducted online and by phone from February 28 to March 4, with 600 men and women interviewed in Hebrew and 150 in Arabic.
[ad_2]
Source link
