[ad_1]
The most ‘sinister’ part of Mr Sunak’s speech, according to Labor colleague and human rights lawyer
Labor MP and human rights lawyer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti speaks to Trevor Phillips about Rishi Sunak’s speech on Friday.
The speech came after George Galloway’s election and after Lee Anderson was suspended from the Conservative Party.
Baroness Chakrabarti, a former director of the charity Liberty, said the most “sinister” part of the speech was when Mr Sunak “implied that he had read the Riot Act to the police”. .
she says: “In a liberal democracy, he now claims to be a liberal patriot, but I think that was the word he used. We don’t have a prime minister who interferes with policing.”
Labor colleagues said this had happened many times under Mr Sunak, where police chiefs were called to Downing Street and then a press release was issued about what they had been told by the Prime Minister.
Baroness Chakrabarti took issue with the use of the word ominous, saying: “At a time when so many ministers and senior Tory leaders are adding fuel to the flames of polarization and culture wars, Mr Sunak is “I use that word because I want to put a smile on my face when I talk about it,” he said. , Dividing Our Country” – singles out Lee Anderson and Suella Braverman.
Phillips also spoke to journalist Sarfraz Manzoor.
Manzoor said the speech was “born out of calculation and cynicism rather than conviction.”
He said too many politicians on both sides appear to be “comfortable with platitudes and chicanery” and “spout pious words rather than actually speak with conviction.”
“So if you don’t have someone who can speak with clarity and nuance, I think this territory is ceded to someone who speaks with conviction, even if what they’re saying is complete nonsense.” ” Manzoor said. Say.
[ad_2]
Source link
