[ad_1]
Apple is officially under surveillance by the US Department of Justice. The Department of Justice has filed an antitrust lawsuit against the tech giant, accusing it of maintaining a monopoly on the iPhone.
The Justice Department alleges that monopoly has caused a lack of growth in the sector, harming competitors, developers and consumers. They allege that Apple has taken anticompetitive measures to prevent consumers from purchasing iPhones. It restricts smartwatch compatibility with third-party wallets, blocks cross-platform messaging apps, and makes controversial decisions to discourage non-App Store programs. The Department of Justice also alleges that Apple’s anticompetitive conduct is exclusionary due to contractual restrictions and fees that intentionally limit the features and functionality offered within the iPhone and its operating system.
In an 88-page lawsuit filed earlier this week, the government said “each step of Apple’s course of action has built and strengthened the moat around its smartphone monopoly.” The cumulative effect of this series of actions is to maintain and entrench Apple’s smartphone monopoly at the expense of users, developers, and other third parties who helped make the iPhone what it is today. Ta. ” The lawsuit aims to seek “the relief necessary to cure anticompetitive harm” in the form of an injunction to stop Apple’s alleged anticompetitive conduct. “Consumers should not have to pay higher prices just because a company violates antitrust laws,” U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement. We argue that Apple’s monopoly power in the smartphone market is not just an advantage over the competition, it violates federal antitrust laws. If left unchecked, Apple will continue to strengthen its smartphone monopoly. ”
Apple refutes this claim in its own statement. “At Apple, we innovate every day to make technology people love. We design products that work together seamlessly, protect people’s privacy and security, and create magical experiences for users. ” This lawsuit threatens who we are and the principles that make Apple products stand out in a fiercely competitive market. If we succeed, it will impede our ability to develop the kind of technology that people have come to expect from Apple at the intersection of hardware, software, and services. It would also set a dangerous precedent, giving governments greater influence over how people design technology. ”
[ad_2]
Source link
