[ad_1]
In most cases, these bombshell statements are said to have exploded around the Biden administration. In many cases, they focus on efforts to frame the case for impeaching the president based on House Republicans’ actions toward that end. A new interview with the person House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said gave a terrible assessment of Biden? bomb! Please put it on air!
As Biden’s continued presidency suggests, these bombshell statements are no less outrageous. The same thing happened again on Tuesday night.
“Today, Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, gave explosive testimony to members of Congress on the Hill as part of the ongoing Biden impeachment inquiry,” Hannity said in his opening monologue. However, strangely, it was only after the discussion. Night’s special election and effort to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. One might wonder if Biden’s bombshell exposing corruption deserved the first slot on the show, but who would question Fox News’ editorial decisions?
But Hannity was clear. This testimony was damning for the president. Bobulinski told investigators that the Chinese government had “successfully attempted to infiltrate and compromise the Joe Biden and Obama-Biden White Houses.” “Today, Joe Biden’s immediate family has received tens of millions of dollars from other countries, including Russia, Ukraine, Romania, and Kazakhstan,” Bobulinski told lawmakers. “The Biden family’s business was Joe Biden. ” he is said to have said.
Hannity declared that all of this is “nothing short of an unmitigated disaster for Team Biden.”
There has long been no question that Joe Biden’s family, especially his son Hunter and brother Jim, intended to use their last name as a source of income. Last year, House investigators heard testimony from Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s former business partner, in which Archer made similar statements. Archer also said that Hunter and Jim Biden are selling the Biden “brand,” meaning the perception that they have access to Joe Biden’s influence. Archer also discussed an email in which Hunter Biden explicitly mentioned the need to strengthen that awareness.
But Archer, like others who testified as part of the House investigation, denied that Joe Biden was actually involved in the business. Hunter Biden tried to give the impression that he was a conduit to power, but it was just an impression. Despite months of attempts, and despite rhetoric from people like Comer, there is no solid evidence to the contrary.
We don’t know everything Bobulinski told investigators. But you can watch his opening statement obtained by the New York Post (like Mr. Hannity, who continues to invest in the idea that Joe Biden has somehow been discovered).
In his prepared remarks, Bobulinski noted that he has been trying to amplify questions about Joe Biden for four years. The reason: “From my direct personal experience and what I have since learned, Joe Biden said, ‘That brand is sold by the Biden family.'” Allegations center on Hunter Biden and a Chinese energy company. It relates to a transaction between the parties, in which Mr. Bobulinski was originally a participant. This is where the term “infiltration and compromise” regarding the White House comes from.
Bobulinski multiple times complained The Bidens gave him clear reasons to hustle him about the deal and take his claims at face value. The fact that he collaborated with Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign multiple times only adds to the skepticism, but that can be put aside. His claim itself is questionable.
Notice, for example, that he mentions that his opinion of Biden is partially based on “what I’ve since learned.” His opening statement included references to things that have been touted and exposed by Republican investigations, including text messages sent by Hunter Biden and sources of income he received from foreign officials. There is. His testimony was, at least in part, a regurgitation of the results of the investigation to investigators.
Meanwhile, the idea that President Obama-Biden’s White House was compromised by China depends on the timing of Hunter Biden’s contact with Chinese energy company CEFC. As Bobulinski pointed out (and as reported by news outlets such as the Washington Post), the first aid efforts took place in late 2015. However, the agreement between the two sides came after they met in Miami in early 2017 after Joe Biden left his public office. Even if Joe Biden was intricately involved in the deal (independent assessments already indicate he was not), it is unclear what impact this is said to have had on his administration. do not have.
Mr. Hannity’s show on Tuesday included the three House committee chairs tasked with running the impeachment inquiry: Mr. Comer, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), and House Ways and Means Chairman Jason T. Smith. (R-Missouri). . Mr. Hannity asked Mr. Jordan, whose committee helped organize the Bobulinski deposition, whether investigators would obtain more bank records that suggest Joe Biden benefited in some way. .
“Well,” Jordan began. “What we really want now is the information that Robert Herr has.”
That’s a teaching. Axios reported Tuesday that House Republicans want to expand on Special Counsel Robert K. Hur’s findings. He reported that he was not determined that Biden should not be indicted for keeping classified documents in his home, but instead wanted to emphasize his portrayal of Biden as suffering. . From memory loss. Hannity asked Jordan if he could prove that Biden is corrupt, and Jordan said what they would prove. Really What was being sought was the president’s mental health.
But Jordan returned to the issue at hand.
“This is probably the best thing I got from one of Hunter Biden’s business associates a few weeks ago when Joe Biden showed up at the Four Seasons restaurant for lunch,” Jordan said. “The lunch was attended by Hunter Biden and his colleagues, as well as eight Chinese officials, including executives from the Chinese energy company CEFC. Joe Biden arrives, gives a short presentation and leaves. Three weeks later. , the transaction was close and $3 million would be transferred to Biden’s account. That’s what was happening.”
This is completely false. Jordan is referring to testimony from Hunter Biden associate Rob Walker, who was present at the May 2017 meeting (also after Joe Biden left office). We know that Mr. Jordan is referring to Mr. Walker’s testimony, since he was not present at that meeting, by Mr. Bobulinski’s own admission.
Walker testified that Joe Biden was present at the lunch for “probably 10 minutes.” He was asked if he had made a “little presentation” by the MP. Instead, Walker responded, “We had a nice, normal chat.” I think he probably finished most of the talking and left. ” Walker was then asked a pointed question: “Did Biden give a presentation?”
“No, it’s not a presentation,” Walker replied. “He didn’t.” In fact, at another point Joe Biden said he didn’t know why this group was there and explicitly said, “Good luck with whatever you guys do.” .
By the way, the congressman who asked if there was a presentation was Jordan.
House Republicans have often pointed to Hunter Biden’s use of Joe Biden in this way as evidence of Joe Biden’s involvement. Hunter Biden’s business partners continue to unequivocally reject that idea.
It’s nothing new for Jordan to provide Hannity with a disingenuous summary of events. When House Republicans held their only hearing on impeachment (which didn’t go well), Hannity invited the same three chairs to weigh in on the evidence they had. Jordan acknowledged claims that turned out to be false that Joe Biden took official actions to benefit his son’s Ukrainian business partners.
Mr. Hannity also asked James Comer on Tuesday what he learned from Mr. Bobulinsky. Mr. Comer, who has a habit of slipping away with his skis on, claimed that Mr. Bobulinski presented evidence that “Joe Biden was working for the Chinese,” which, if true, would likely be part of the gist of his testimony. It would have been mentioned inside. (Please take this summary with a grain of salt.)
Mr. Hannity also confronted Mr. Kamel about Mr. Bobulinskiy’s mention of money from foreign business partners, which perhaps falls under the category of “things I have since learned” from Mr. Bobulinskiy.
“Well,” Comer replied, “that’s well over the 20 million that the Biden faction got. Well over 8 million from China. Today, that’s because of Joe Biden. I get it. They didn’t do anything for Hunter Biden.”
This nearly $20 million claim is several months old and has been repeatedly proven false. As expected, Hannity didn’t hold back at all.
Instead, he asked lawmakers what charges they thought could be brought against Joe Biden, given the evidence gathered so far. Mr. Jordan raised his thoughts on “the potential for interference, the potential for money laundering, the potential for bribery.” Comer argued that while the amounts that went to Hunter and Jim Biden “certainly meet the definition of bribes,” they did not. Smith said only that Biden “will go down as the most corrupt and compromised precedent of our lifetime.”
Hannity then asked if he thought the House would impeach Biden. The answer is more lukewarm, perhaps across the board.
Maybe my colleagues in the House Republican conference aren’t keeping track of all the bombshells Sean Hannity has put forth.
[ad_2]
Source link
