Garrick: Is it unsuitable for modern society?

[ad_1]

So the Guardian has achieved another coup, said Melanie McDonagh. evening standard. Last week, Amelia Gentleman – Journalist; windrush scandal – named 60 prominent members of the men-only Garrick Club and criticized them in much the same spirit as he criticizes members of the English Defense League.

Dozens of those found guilty of preferring to socialize with other men in grand central London buildings include senior politicians (Michael Gove, Jacob Rees-Mogg); civil servants and the attorney general, several big-name actors (including Brian Cox, Benedict Cumberbatch) and several major figures in the art world.

apply 1 week

Escape from the echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news and analysis from multiple perspectives.

Subscribe and save

Sign up for this week’s free newsletter

From our morning news briefing to our weekly Good News newsletter, get the week’s best stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Of course their excuses were nonsense, Boris Johnson said in the Daily Mail. No one joins Garrick to reform him. They join because they’re excited to join an elite club and think it’s a comfortable place to be. I should know that I was once a member for a short time, and that I worked closely with some of my ‘journalistic heroes’, including John Simpson of the BBC and Alan Rusbridger, then editor of the Guardian. I mean, I was excited to stand shoulder to shoulder with them. If I had been asked that question, I would have expressed support for reform. But I don’t think members of the Garrick family should be bullied for their “old-fashioned” traditions.

The classic defense is that it’s more relaxing for men to socialize without the presence of the opposite sex, Gabby Hinsliff said in the Guardian. And Garrick argues that it is a purely social environment and that work is prohibited. But while it is fanciful to suggest that those in power run the world from their oak-paneled rooms, this is where important connections are made, old bonds strengthened, and favors exchanged. It is certainly one of the best spaces in the world.

But the real problem for the public figures on Garrick’s membership list is that choosing to spend a night in a club that reeks of an unreformed establishment and actively forbids women is… This is incompatible with the work of leading today’s diverse organizations. government sector. It has been more than 20 years since former Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith refused to become an honorary member of the Carlton Club because it did not admit women. What on earth are politicians, judges, and civil servants doing in a place like this in 2024?

To continue reading this article…

Create a free account

Continue reading this article and get access to exclusive websites every month.

Do you already have an account? Sign in

Subscribe to “This Week”

Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters, and more.

You can cancel or pause at any time.

Already a subscriber to The Week?

Digital and Print + Digital subscriptions include access to unlimited websites.
Create an account To unlock access, use the same email registered with your subscription.

[ad_2]

Source link

Garrick: Is it unsuitable for modern society?

T20 World Cup: Quiet contributions from Akshar Patel, Kuldeep Yadav and Ravindra Jadeja justify Rohit Sharma’s spin vision | Cricket News

Bartok: The World of Lilette

India vs South Africa: Winners or losers? The world will judge them tonight but it won’t be fair | Cricket News

Garrick: Is it unsuitable for modern society?

nonsense excuse

Related Posts

T20 World Cup: Quiet contributions from Akshar Patel, Kuldeep Yadav and Ravindra Jadeja justify Rohit Sharma’s spin vision | Cricket News

Bartok: The World of Lilette

India vs South Africa: Winners or losers? The world will judge them tonight but it won’t be fair | Cricket News