[ad_1]
Supply chain reports suggest Apple’s first foldable device could launch later than some sources have suggested, in 2026 or 2027, but that It is unclear whether it will be an iPhone or a replacement for the iPad mini.
The report is difficult to understand because there are so few details, and the authors admit they don’t really know what it means…
Apple is in no hurry
As we’ve noted many times before, Apple is taking its usual wait-and-see attitude when it comes to foldable devices, ignoring all the problems that come with rivals like Samsung trying to be on the cutting edge of new technology. I am to be troubled.
Samsung provided a case study on the dangers of launching new technology too soon, with the launch of its first Galaxy Fold model being a complete disaster. Pre-orders went smoothly, but it took only 48 hours for reviewers to discover serious issues when they tested the device. Samsung originally announced it would delay the release until May before canceling pre-orders. The company then discussed a July launch, but canceled that as well.
It finally launched, but the fourth iteration also saw the launch of sister sites. 9to5Google It turns out the biggest flaw still exists. The screen broke within a few days of receiving it.
Foldable iPhone or iPad?
As I’ve said before, the big question is whether Apple will make an ultra-sized iPhone that folds in half to fit in your pocket, or an iPad that folds in half to become iPhone-sized.
There are two different ways to design a foldable iPhone that opens to reveal an 8-inch display. First, it has a vertical crease similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2. What you get is a device that’s slim enough to fit in a jacket pocket, but opens up to reveal a fairly wide iPad mini-like display.
An alternative is a horizontal fold like the 2019 Motorola Razr. This gives you an ultra-pocket-sized device that opens up into an even larger Pro Max, giving you even more vertical space instead of horizontal space.
A long time ago, most of you agreed with me that Razr’s approach made more sense, and I’ll explain below if that’s still the case.
Latest supply chain report
The ElecThe latest report is completely useless. Display suppliers Samsung and LG have been sending samples of folding screens to Apple for the company’s consideration for some time, the paper said, with the latest ones in the 7- to 8-inch range.
Samsung Display and LG Display have reportedly already sent samples of late 6-inch and late 7-inch foldable panels to Apple, respectively, last year.
In the case of late 7-inch to early 8-inch foldable products that Apple is considering [this year], Industry speculation is that it will be a foldable iPhone or foldable iPad model.Product properties and specifications have not yet been determined […]
The concept for a late 7-inch to early 8-inch Apple foldable is to replace the 8.3-inch iPad mini.
9to5Mac’s opinion
One theory is that the device is a foldable iPhone. The largest iPhone screen currently manufactured by Apple is 6.7 inches diagonally, but if you imagine a Razr-style device that folds down the middle, even an 8-inch display will fit in your pocket.
Another theory is that Apple is working on a foldable iPad before a foldable iPhone. For example, an 11-inch iPad folds to the size of an iPad mini.
However, this report specifically suggests displays in the 7-inch to 8-inch range. Fold it in half and you have an iPhone. Does that mean it will replace the iPad mini?
Some might argue that if you have a foldable iPhone that opens to an 8-inch screen, you don’t need an iPad mini anymore. The problem with this discussion is price. Foldables are expensive, and so are large-screen iPhones. Combining the two can be costly Method It exceeds the iPad mini.
Given that a significant portion of the iPad mini market is business, used for things like warehouse inventory and ordering tablets for restaurant wait staff, price is important, so even if Apple makes a foldable iPhone. Even with the same size screen I don’t think I’ll let go of the device.
The bottom line here is that this report makes little sense. Even if this site’s sources are correct, the only solid information is that Apple’s two major display suppliers are sending the company samples of folding displays in various sizes, but this is not true. This cannot be called breaking news. Suppliers send all kinds of samples to Apple all the time.
Still, while we’re here, let’s update that survey. For example, if you had to choose between an 11-inch or 12-inch iPad that folds to the size of an iPad mini, or an iPhone Pro-size iPad that folds to the size of an iPad mini and 7 or 8 inches, which would you prefer?
9to5Mac collage with Apple and Luke Chesser images on Unsplash
FTC: We use automated affiliate links that generate income. more.
[ad_2]
Source link
