[ad_1]
Apple will need to “rethink” the design of its next iPhone if it wants to comply with Oregon’s new Right to Repair law, a repair expert claims.
Ricky Panesar, founder of iCorrect, said that since a new repair bill was signed by Oregon Governor Tina Kotek on March 27, Apple has been unable to prevent parts pairing (unauthorized components from working on devices). He said that there is a need to change practices regarding co.uk and the person who discovered the failure to repair some Apple devices.
“Apple isn’t going to stop selling phones, but it will need to rethink the combination of parts for devices sold after 2025. Apple will need to change the way it designs the next iPhone. Deaf,” explains Panesar. ”
Oregon’s Right to Repair bill, effective January 1, 2025, will make it easier for equipment owners and independent repair shops to repair appliances. Similar to California’s Right to Repair law, Oregon’s new law requires businesses to provide open access to tools, documentation, and parts, as well as authorized repair shops. But the bill goes further than California’s law, as it would be the first to ban a practice called part pairing.
Also known as serialization, this means that when certain parts (such as cameras, displays, and batteries) are paired with a logic board and Apple’s tuning tools are not applied, they may not work, even if they are from the same model. cannot be replaced without losing it. Already used. This tool is available only to Apple and Apple authorized repair stores.
Oregon law is very specific in this regard, and its purpose is to “reduce functionality so that an independent repairer or owner cannot install or enable an otherwise functional replacement part.” The goal is to prevent companies from doing anything that “obstructs or obstructs the law.” or the performance of household electronic devices,” or forcing gadgets to display “misleading warnings or warnings regarding unidentified parts that cannot be readily ignored by the owner.”
Apple uses part pairing in several products. iPhone 15 loses battery health indicators if the battery is incorrectly replaced. On certain his MacBook models, if you replace the screen without Apple’s permission, a white shadow will appear around the camera. The same goes for Apple Pencil, and if you use it on an iPad Pro whose screen has been replaced, you won’t be able to draw straight lines.
But Pancesar hopes the new bill will change all that. “This will be very useful for future repairs and refurbishments. Pairing parts meant everything had to go through Apple, which meant that if a company wanted to, they could decide on prices and delivery times and buy parts. It’s a monopoly. So the question is, what happens to the current devices that are paired? Unless forced to do so by the EU or other governing bodies, Apple I don’t think that will bring it back.”
What will happen to the current iPhone, or future devices with paired parts, is certainly a big question. Should Apple change its policy and make part adjustment tools available to everyone? Oregon’s new repair rules only apply to phones sold after July 1, 2021 . Does that mean older iPhones with serialized parts need to be updated to ensure there is no two-step repair system?
Apple has been forced to make changes after losing to lawmakers in the past. The company has removed the Lightning connector from iPhones after EU regulators announced that all smartphones must use USB-C connectors as standard. The prospect of something similar happening again may be why Apple opposed Oregon’s bill last year, even though it supported California’s less aggressive Right to Repair law.
But Oregon’s new law has support from local repair shops, the Oregon Technology Association, and Google, which testified in favor of the law. Google made it clear in a white paper published in January that it opposes serialization.
“Policies should restrict OEMs from imposing unfair anti-repair practices, such as pairing parts, using software barriers to prevent consumers or independent repair shops from replacing components, or Other limiting obstacles to repair should be discouraged,” the paper states.
Apple has been fighting right-to-repair laws for years, trying to block them in states like Nebraska and New York. But that all changed last year when Apple suddenly decided to uphold California’s Right to Repair law. However, this recommendation came with a caveat regarding the combination of parts. In a memo to the bill’s author, Sen. Susan Talamantes Eggman, the company said it supports the law as long as there is a “requirement for repairers to disclose the use of non-genuine or used parts.” The importance is clearly mentioned. Number of parts to pair with Apple’s plans.
Both Apple and Google (and Samsung) have improved the repairability of their devices in recent years. Apple created its own repair program, while Google extended its software support promise to his seven years. But the combination of parts remains the dividing line between the two companies, and Google, which testifies in favor of the bill, likely knows it will hurt Apple. What happens next, and how Apple responds, will be one of the most interesting technology dramas to watch next year.
check out my website.
[ad_2]
Source link
