[ad_1]
I looked through all 274 responses to a survey I sent out about how politics affects the love lives of Americans under 30, and found that a significant number of respondents said they We focused on the fact that people used economic terms to describe their romantic experiences. In particular, the word “scarcity” came up again and again as a factor in the dating experience.
A very liberal man in New York said he wouldn’t even consider dating someone who listed “moderate” on their dating profile, adding, “Perhaps it’s unfair, but there are so many left-leaning dating sites. When there is more, the idea of scarcity does not exist.” We need to interact and test that assessment. ” A very liberal woman living in Denver had the opposite perspective because she felt there were fewer liberal men. Democrats,” she said.
I began to wonder if people tend to date rationally within their own love markets when it comes to politics. And I started thinking that when it comes to dating, maybe the total number of liberals and conservatives in the country doesn’t matter as much as where they are. Is it dispersed, whether there are discrepancies in smaller geographical areas?
This means that if you live in a big city with a lot of politically like-minded people, you can afford to exclude people with whom you don’t really agree. If you live in a smaller or more politically mixed environment, you don’t have the luxury of being as selective about who you date unless you significantly limit who you date. In Brooklyn, for example, registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans by about 8 to 1. So for my own liberal bubble of daters, it doesn’t matter all that much that men are more likely to be conservative in this country as a whole. A New Yorker is unlikely to date someone who currently lives in Alabama or Wyoming.
(It is worth noting here that some political scientists have said: pushed back To begin with, it’s about the idea that the political gulf between young men and women is widening. There is evidence that both men and women under 30 are becoming more liberal over time. )
Recognizing that the Times readers who answered my questions were not demographically unique, my theory was developed by several scholars who have studied politics and dating, and my observations We looked to see if there were any studies that might explain or give more weight to it. Representative sample. The short answer is that when people are looking for a serious relationship, they generally seek a partner who is similar to them in many ways. This is called homosexuality.
But politics is just one area where homosexuality is possible. Factors people consider when looking for a spouse include education level, religion, attractiveness (however you define it), race, and more. If you’re dating in a market where political identification is difficult to find, or if you don’t really care about politics to begin with, you may value other factors more.
Neil Malhotra, a professor of political economy at the Stanford Graduate School of Business who has published research on political homosexuality and online dating, along with co-author Gregory Hoover, argues that sharing politics can help one person engage with another. He said he discovered that it increases sex. On other online dating platforms, he said, the importance of politics is “much smaller than things like age and religion. And it’s smaller than education.” Malhotra and Hoover use data from people who were actively dating online in 2010 (a long time ago for both the political and online dating worlds) to target partners of the opposite sex. With the important caveat that they were focusing on people, they said they found that politics “clearly does not govern all the normal choices people make.”
There are also ways in which online dating in particular can influence people’s ideas about the political leanings of a particular dating market. Casey Klofstad, chair of the political science department at the University of Miami, said politics is a “coat of clothing” for online daters. “Choosing to display it suggests that you value it and are trying to attract like-minded people,” Klovstad said. “And the people who do that are the ones who are, on average, more politically engaged.”
If you meet someone in real life, you probably won’t know his beliefs until you’ve gone on a few dates, unless he shows his political stance in a T-shirt slogan or bumper sticker, but at that point… You can miss it then. There are some political differences as long as they don’t conflict with your most deeply held values. For example, many liberals and liberal-leaning people who responded to my survey said they would date a conservative unless they were a Trump supporter. Similarly, a minority of conservatives said they were comfortable hanging out with liberals as long as they were not anti-Israel.
I would argue that, beyond partisan politics, the more profound changes we are seeing today are increased selection for education and income.
Researchers from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, Aarhus University, and the University of Michigan used Danish data (they note that similar data was not available in the United States) to find that Danes were more likely to receive I discovered that I categorized myself more intentionally. and They defined it as choosing a career with long-term, high-wage growth. “Researchers demonstrated that between 1980 and 2018, self-categorization as like-minded couples increased by approximately 25 percent,” said Katie Gilbert, who summarized the study results on Kellogg’s website. ” he said.
There is a similar movement in the United States. Ryan Burge, an associate professor of political science at Eastern Illinois University, analyzed data from the General Social Survey and shared it with me via email. He found that in the 1970s, among people with graduate degrees who responded to a survey, “39 percent of them married someone with an education less than a high school diploma.” 57% married someone with at least a four-year degree. In the 2020s, only 19% of people with a graduate degree married someone with a high school diploma or less, and 78% married someone with a college degree. In a paper published in 2012, Klovstad and co-author Lindy Anderson found that “individuals of both sexes seek mates with similar incomes, regardless of local resource pressures.” ” I discovered that.
Gen Z is a generation that has become known for its general distrust of social institutions, but is still entering adulthood. I often wonder if the ugliness of our polarized landscape is affecting our youngest people, who see the resentment and division and want nothing to do with it.
Although there is evidence of liberal tendencies among both Millennials and Gen Z, a new report from the Public Religion Research Institute finds notable differences between Gen Z adults and Gen Z teens. It turns out that there is. They are also more likely to have no political affiliation. The political gender gap among Gen Z teens is also smaller than the political gender gap among Gen Z adults, with 27 percent of teenage girls identifying as liberal, and 27 percent of teenage boys identifying as liberal. The same goes for 21 percent.
Maybe I’m an old-fashioned romantic, but after spending a few weeks talking to 20-somethings who are dating, I find that they find the right person just like previous generations. I believe that I am deaf. Everyone I talked to said they wanted to have a serious, lasting relationship someday, even if they didn’t want to build a lasting partnership in the near future. The process of emerging into the world at a young age is always tricky, and when you look back on it, it’s easy to end up with rose-tinted glasses.
[ad_2]
Source link
