[ad_1]
Roberts, who oversees emergency requests from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, said in a one-paragraph order that he sees no basis to challenge last week’s Court of Appeals ruling that Navarro must serve time in prison pending appeal. Stated.
Mr. Navarro was sentenced in January. Four months after a jury convicted him of two counts of contempt of Congress.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit last week denied Navarro’s request for freedom. The three-judge panel said Navarro “has not shown that his appeal may present any significant questions of law or fact.” to revoke his conviction or sentence;
After the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, Navarro published a book about a conspiracy to tip the election to Trump during that day’s electoral vote counting. He credits the idea to right-wing podcast host and former Trump strategist Stephen K. Bannon.
The House committee investigating the attack issued subpoenas to Mr. Navarro and Mr. Bannon to detail these plans, but both men ignored them. The two men are currently contesting prison sentences for contempt of Congress. But the district court judge overseeing Mr. Bannon’s case allowed him to remain in prison while Mr. Bannon refuses to testify and pursues an appellate argument unavailable to Mr. Navarro. He relied on advice from his lawyer.
Navarro’s lawyer declined to comment Monday, but told the Supreme Court on Friday that his client “does not pose a flight risk or a danger to public safety if released pending appeal.” There’s no room,” he said.
Lawyers said their clients refused to respond to the Congressional subpoena because they believed it was necessary to assert executive privilege. They argued that the law is not clear as to whether Congress intended to punish the president’s senior advisers in this situation.
But Navarro has no documentation showing that Trump planned to assert that privilege to prevent aides from testifying, and Trump has never publicly corroborated Navarro’s account. do not have.
Roberts denied Navarro’s request on Monday, agreeing with the appeals court’s finding that Navarro waived his right to challenge the district court’s finding that executive privilege was not invoked at this stage.
Rachel Weiner contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link
